Decades Blogathon – Death At A Funeral (2007)

Decades 17

Welcome to Day 1 of the Decades Blogathon – ‘7’ edition – hosted by myself and Tom from the brilliant blog Thomas J! The blogathon focuses on movies that were released in the seventh year of the decade. Tom and I are running a different entry each day (we’ll also reblog the other’s post) and for today I’m very pleased to welcome Gill from Realweegiemidget Reviews, who is covering 2007’s British black comedy Death At A Funeral.

After a tip off from a good friend and blogger I heard the Decades Blogathon was looking for posts for its yearly extravaganza. Being late to joining last year, with my review of About Last Night (1986), I was keen to join this year’s fun. I requested to do this movie, a dark British comedy with a favourite TV actress Keeley Hawes from Ashes To Ashes (2008-10). I envied Hawes for her ‘will they wont they’ romance with Gene Hunt in the show and played to full manly manliness with the lovely Philip Glenister. He had me at his sheer masterful presence and Manchester accent. Anyway, so happy to have been selected by the guys to join this year’s blogathon and onto my review…

Deaf At A Funeral Poster

Part farce, mostly black comedy, I’d spotted this film in the Netflix list for British comedy films and had made a mental note to watch it. All I knew that it starred the lovely Keeley Hawes, who played Alex Drake in my time travel TV series favourite with Philip Glenister, Ashes To Ashes (2008-10). In what could possibly be described as a Richard Curtis dream cast, Hawes acts alongside what seems like a zillion British cast members including Hawes’ real life husband, actor Matthew MacFadyen. Support also comes from Ewen Bremner, Kris Marshall and Rupert Graves. And that’s just some of the Brits. Add two Americans Peter Dinklage and Alan Tudyk – leading to the first surprising revelation of this film as Tudyk adopts a perfectly convincing English accent – and that’s just a fraction of this ensemble.

Death At A Funeral (2007) tells about mild-mannered Daniel Howells, who is organising his father’s funeral in his nice, ancestral, family country home. You can tell this film is going to be seriously dark from the outset, as the wrong coffin is brought to the Howells’ ancestral home. After Daniel doesn’t recognise the body, the coffin is hastily replaced with the right one. Daniel and his apparently oft nagging wife Jane (Hawes) are planning on moving out, and have made plans to get an apartment of their own, leaving his widowed mother for a space of their own. They are awaiting money to put towards this venture from Robert, Daniel’s famous writer brother who is flying over for the funeral from the States. We meet the other family members as they drive to the funeral.

Death At A Funeral

In no particular order, there is Daniel’s renowned, successful writer brother Robert, a long-haired (on first impressions it’s a case of really what were you thinking?) Rupert Graves. We are introduced to the brothers’ cousins on first appearances, loud but loyal, Martha (Daisy Donovan) and pharmaceutical student Troy (Kris Marshall); and Martha’s sensible boyfriend, Simon (Alan Tudyk) and old Uncle Alfie played by Peter Vaughan. Still with me? Also, we meet another cousin, Howard (Andy Nyman) and his friend Justin (Ewen Bremner). At the funeral, we meet Daniel and Robert’s mother Sandra, (Jane Asher) and the father to Martha and Troy, Uncle Victor (Peter Egan). And that covers almost everybody that you need to know about right now.

Now I’ll move on… but please use the last paragraph if you are easily confused. So en route to the funeral, Martha and Simon pick up Troy. Troy’s just been talking with a friend about a wonder drug he’s invented which can result in hallucinations… pharmaceutical student, really? Anyway Troy hastily puts some in an empty bottle labelled Diazepam – an anxiety reliever – which leads us to the most crucial part of this storyline. See where I’m heading? Simon is desperately nervous about meeting their father as the couple are wanting to impress him. So Martha gives Simon what she thinks is Diazepam. Oblivious to this, Troy puts the tablet bottle in his pocket before the three head to the funeral.

Death At A Funeral

Howard, meanwhile, is revealed to be a bit of a hypochondriac with Justin pestering him with twenty questions centering around Martha, an apparent object of his affections. They pick up cantankerous Uncle Alfie in his wheelchair. Meanwhile at the funeral, Daniel is unsure about his eulogy, leading to an ongoing gag where all of the attendees ask him hopefully if his talented writer brother will be providing this. Including his mother. And the country vicar. Which doesn’t do his morale much good as he’s a struggling writer. His brother, meanwhile, has confessed he’s broke, using the last of his money on a first class plane fare over. Simon starts feeling the effects of this drug on the way seeing everything in a vivid green and hallucinating at the most inappropriate times. Martha tells Troy, who confesses all her, finding he’s dropped the pill bottle. Also at the funeral, we meet Peter (Peter Dinklage), a mysterious attendee who has a secret which he reveals to Daniel. Peter claims Daniel’s father wasn’t the happily married family man he appeared to be; and after showing Daniel evidence around this, he asks for money from Daniel to ensure his silence.

As you will find from watching more of this witty, farcical movie, our first impressions of this apparently normal British family aren’t true. Each has their own little eccentricities and backstory too. With every revelation or confession, each family encounter and full-blown disaster, it becomes more and more darkly fun to watch. Many of the family’s foibles and tales are linked together, with more complications added as the film progresses than your average episode of your favourite soap with just as many characters. So if you must go for a pee, press pause!

Death At A Funeral

The parts are delightfully played and special mention has to go to MacFadyen who convinced me as the man forever in the shadow of his more successful brother. I could feel his frustration, and felt for him with his later outbursts to a well-meaning – not nagging – wife, Jane. Hawes played her supportive wife role so well, as her apparently nagging scenes at the start with her on-off-screen husband took a new meaning. Looking into her eyes you could see her love, concern and well-meaning. Graves, as the caddish brother suited this part well, with his foppish hair now adding to his roguish charm, in the sort of role you’d expect a post-Daniel Cleaver Hugh Grant to play. But to me, Graves will always be Freddy – Helena Bonham Carter as Lucy Honeychurch’s kid brother – in A Room With A View (1985) and 80s crush. Kris Marshall played the hapless, hopeless role he’s loved for which was probably the least surprise in this movie (unless you’ve never seen Love Actually (2003) or My Family (2000-11)). As for Dinklage, he was so fantastic in his wee role that his part was rewritten specifically for him after his successful audition. In fact, he even returned to the part in the remake, released a mere three years later in the same role but under a different name. The remake, also named Death At A Funeral (2010) boasts an all-American cast including Zoe Saldana, Chris Rock and Danny Glover.

All in all this was a watchable film, despite its macabre type setting and gags. It reminded me of The Big Chill (1983), a film with another fantastic ensemble cast – which included Kevin Kline, Glenn Close, Tom Berenger, William Hurt and Jeff Goldblum – also centering around a funeral.  Where The Big Chill had more one liners, this film has more farcical moments to it. The Big Chill has many of my favourite lines in movies, provided by Kline and the cast and a full review may come soon. Kline has a bizarre connection to the British Death Of A Funeral film, he starred in a film In & Out (1997) which shared the same director as this film, Frank Oz. Oz also starred in The Muppet Show (1976-81) and is more renowned as the voice of Yoda in the Star Wars films. So, as my final recommendation, to paraphrase Yoda “Do watch, or do watch not, there is no try” and to paraphrase two of his more famous lines: “May the Force humour be with you”  as “The Dark Side humour I sense in you”.

Decades Blogathon – Still Time To Be Part Of Something Great!

Decades 17

Thank you to everyone who has jumped on board for this year’s Decades Blogathon, hosted by myself and Tom from the never-less-than-excellent Thomas J.

We still have a few slots left, so this is your final call ladies and gentlemen to get involved in the film blogging event of the year (possibly…)!

Here’s a recap of what you need to know:

  • Pick a film from any decade with the year ending in ‘7’. There are a lot of great movies to choose from, whether it’s Star Wars from ’77 (can’t believe that one hasn’t been taken yet), Boogie Nights from ’97, or The Graduate from ’67.
  • Postings will go up on a first-come, first-served basis (no time wasters please!). We’ll put up the entries that come in first and there will be one posted every day on this site and Thomas J, with each entry having a corresponding re-blog on the other site.
  • Like last year, we’ll be capping the number of posts to 20 – as of writing this, we have a total of 12. Please only send in one piece so we can maximise the number of contributors (Tom and I will also be included in that count, with our reviews coming at the end).
  • If you want to become involved, send an email to either myself (threerowsback@gmail.comor Tom (tomlittle2011@gmail.com) with your suggestion. If no one else has already claimed your selection then you’re on board! We’ll then ask you to send us your post (with accompanying images) to the same email addresses as soon as possible. We ask that you send us an original piece (i.e. not one you’ve already run on your site) and you don’t run it on your site until after we’ve posted.
  • Please let us know ASAP if you’d like to be involved and supply us you contribution as soon as you are able. We’ll be starting the blogathon shortly thereafter.

There will be one review posted each day either on this site or on Thomas J, and whichever site it doesn’t go up on first, it will be re-blogged there on that day.

Don’t miss out!

The Decades Blogathon Is Back!

Decades 17

With our big screens about to be overcome (even more) with a cavalcade of cinematic cash cows, it’s reassuring that in the world of film blogging there is an alternative.

And that alternative is the Decades Blogathon – the third annual extravaganza hosted by yours truly and Tom from the inimitable Thomas J wherein we invite bloggers to review films from different decades.

The previous two blogathons have been a whole heap of fun and the contributions we’ve received have been never less than insightful and fascinating. Well, the time is upon us for another celebration of all things film and we are once again inviting you guys to join us!

As a reminder, the blogathon works like this:

  • Pick a film from any decade with the year ending in ‘7’. And by any film we mean any film – you decide. There’s a lot of movies to choose from so it’s time to put your thinking caps on.
  • Postings will go up on a first-come, first-serve basis (no time wasters please!). We’ll put up the entries that come in first and there will be one posted every day on this site and Thomas J, with each entry having a corresponding re-blog on the other site.
  • Like last year, we’ll be capping the number of posts to 20. This means the blogathon will run for 10 days or so to keep things manageable. Please only send in one piece so we can maximise the number of contributors (Tom and I will also be included in that count, with our reviews coming at the end*).
  • If you want to become involved, send an email to either myself (threerowsback@gmail.comor Tom (tomlittle2011@gmail.com) with your suggestion. If no one else has already claimed your selection then you’re on board! We’ll then ask you to send us your post (with accompanying images) to the same email addresses as soon as possible. We ask that you send us an original piece (i.e. not one you’ve already run on your site) and you don’t run it on your site until after we’ve posted.
  • We’re aiming to start the blogathon in the next few weeks. Please let us know by Monday 8 May if you’d like to be involved and then provide us your article by the following week.

* Fear not, neither of us will be taking Star Wars so that one is free, while the birth of the New Hollywood – 1967 – is there for the taking! Personally, I’ll be covering Paul Thomas Anderson’s 2007 masterpiece There Will Be Blood, while Tom will be taking on Sidney Lumet’s classic 1957 jury room drama 12 Angry Men. All other films released in a year ending ‘7’ are free to choose from, so please get involved – we’re looking forward to receiving your entry!

Great Films You Need To See – Safe (1995)

This is my latest contribution to The Big Picture, the visually focused film magazine that proves there’s more to film than meets the eye. The Big Picture is running a series of features and reviews throughout April with the theme of ‘health and illness’. This piece is part of the site’s Lost Classics section (featuring in my list of Great Films You Need To See), in this case the Todd Haynes’s underseen modern horror Safe.

There’s something horrifically unsettling about being eaten away by something neither you nor seemingly anyone else can fully comprehend.

Safe PosterReleased in 1995 but set eight years earlier, Todd Haynes’ sublime Safe was originally meant as an AIDS allegory. More than two decades later, the film feels even more prescient, even more nightmarishly potent as the pace of change continues at bewildering speed.

Safe is ostensibly about the meek and vanilla Carol (Julianne Moore) succumbing to what she and we later understand is ‘environmental illness’, a debilitating reaction to the various pollutants, chemicals and god knows what else that are as much a part of modern living as climate change.

However, Haynes’ first true masterpiece is also an unblinking critique of the emptiness of western suburbia as well as a quietly damning indictment of the fraudulent touchy-feely self-help racket that charges top dollar without the results to match.

SafeFollowing a series of warning signs (the first thing we see her do is sneeze), Carol is overcome by a coughing fit while driving her car. Her doctor is as befuddled and nonplussed as her husband (Xander Barkley), while her psychiatrist is equally clueless as to how someone whose seemingly stress-free and privileged life (the most worked up she gets is over an incorrectly coloured new couch being delivered) could physically deteriorate so dramatically.

The second half of the film sees Carol moving from her affluent San Fernando Valley home to a self-ascribed healing centre in the desert run by Peter Dunning (Peter Friedman), a self-help guru whose true motivations we suspect are encapsulated in the mansion that looks down on the wood cabins Carol and her fellow residents stay in.

Although largely full of positive, friendly people collectively living with multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), the retreat is just that, an escape from the outside world that allows for plenty of motivational talking from Peter but doesn’t appear to provide a magic wand. Indeed, her physical symptoms, if anything, deteriorate further while the death of a resident offers a sobering tonic.

SafeLikewise, the awkward, rambling speech Carol gives at her surprise birthday party near the end of the film about no longer hating herself and the importance of MCS awareness smacks of Kool-Aid platitudes to the extent that she literally runs out of things to say and ends up staring blankly at the others.

The film’s doom-laden tagline – “In the 21st Century, nobody will be safe” – and its theatrical poster featuring a spookily dressed resident of the retreat may seem like misleading marketing, but there’s a genuinely unsettling edge to the film.

Employing the austere aesthetic of Kubrick, Haynes and cinematographer Alex Nepomniaschy use slow, methodical tracks and zooms, while Moore is often shot at a distance, as if getting too close would pass on the illness she is struggling to understand.

SafeThere’s an industrial hum underlying the first half of the film that’s reminiscent of Lynch and bores into the brain like a form of tinnitus. The Lynch nods can also be found in the Angelo Badalamenti-esque score by Brendan Dolan and Ed Tomney.

Aftershocks from the earthquake that struck the San Fernando Valley in 1994 were apparently occurring during filming and that rumbling sense of foreboding seeps out of every frame, right until its ambiguous ending that finds Carol trying to hold on to a life that has been blighted by forces she doesn’t understand.

SafeDelivering one her on her very finest performances, Moore makes flesh and blood a part that in lesser hands could have been irritating and one-note. Carol is an empty vessel in many ways, a doll who at one point even resembles a shop floor mannequin at a birthday party she attends with other rich housewives. However, she is also a human being going through a terrifying ordeal and Moore garners our sympathy through a heartbreaking turn that’s imbued with loneliness and fear.

Even more of a cautionary tale now as on its release more than 20 years ago, Safe is a modern horror that doesn’t need the traditional tropes to scare us – modern life will do that job just fine.

Review – Get Out

In a perfect world, a film such as Get Out wouldn’t need to exist, so it’s deeply satisfying that Jordan Peele’s debut feature is as deliciously satirical as it is sinister.

Horror has long been a cipher for the ills of society, whether it be mindless consumerism (1978’s Dawn Of The Dead), the fear of technology (1982’s Videodrome) or class division (1989’s Society).

Get Out PosterOne of the most celebrated voices in socially conscious horror is the novelist Ira Levin, whose Rosemary’s Baby and The Stepford Wives have both received excellent adaptations. The ugly underbelly of polite society that’s so memorably exposed in  Stepford was no doubt an influence for Peele when writing Get Out (Wes Craven’s racially charged The People Under The Stairs (1991) also feels like a touchstone).

Whilst Stepford is primarily about gender, Get Out concerns itself with race, specifically the attitudes of white, upper middle class ‘liberals’ who say one thing but whose actions reveal another. This is no mere polemic, however – its razor-sharp script also isn’t afraid to challenge some of the attitudes held by our protagonist Chris Washington (Daniel Kaluuya).

Get OutPeele has spoken of the seeds for the film being sown in the wake of Barack Obama becoming US President when any optimism over the country finally moving past race as an issue proved sadly naive. The election of his successor has compounded this misconception and lent Get Out the added distinction of arguably being the first film to truly address Trump-era America.

Chris is somewhat uneasy about accompanying his white girlfriend Rose (Allison Williams) to meet her parents. Located in a wealthy rural idyll, Dean and Missy (The West Wing‘s Bradley Whitford – nice casting – and Catherine Keener, also excellent) are suffocatingly nice to Chris, who is told they would have “voted for Obama a third time” if they’d had the chance. Alarm bells start ringing when he’s introduced to Walter and Georgina (Marcus Henderson and Betty Gabriel), the couple’s black servants whose ceaseless pleasantries are unsettling to say the least, while Rose’s verbally confrontational brother Jeremy (Caleb Landry Jones) is equally odd. Needless to say things are not what they seem and soon Chris is wishing he’d heeded the warning of one individual to “get out”.

Get OutIt’s impossible to overstate how refreshing it is to be presented with a film that makes you think as much as it churns the guts. An early encounter between Chris, Rose and a casually racist patrol cop who demands to see his driving licence despite the fact he wasn’t behind the wheel is an indication of what’s to come. Likewise, when Chris informs Dean about hitting a deer on the way to their home, the metaphor is left to hang when Dean expresses satisfaction at the thought of controlling the burgeoning population of these creatures in such ways.

A party involving the seemingly well-meaning, but overtly racist local community is wonderfully excruciating, including one pensioner who tells Chris that his favourite golfer is Tiger Woods.

Get OutEvents unsurprisingly take a more disturbing turn as the film sets out its stall for a final act that can’t sustain the smartly staged intrigue and sociopolitical prowess of its first hour or so, but is nevertheless hugely entertaining in its reliance on gore.

Whilst there is much to praise about Get Out, not everything works. Lil Rey Howery’s over-the-top performance as Chris’ suspicious best friend Rod, although amusing, often feels like it belongs in another movie (a scene involving him being laughed off by a bunch of cops doesn’t work). The plot twists are also a little obvious, although they don’t spoil the film.

Small gripes aside, the hypnotically potent Get Out blends provocative social satire and bloody horror to sublime effect.

On a closing note, I normally embed the trailer for the film I’m reviewing. However, due to the sheer amount of plot detail revealed in the trailer for Get Out, on this occasion I will be leaving it off.