There’s a moment in the seedy, southern-fried gothic noir The Paperboy when Nicole Kidman urinates on Zac Efron to relieve his character’s painful jellyfish stings.

Lee Daniels’ The Paperboy – “you’re left scratching your head wondering whether it was all worth the bother”
It’s a bizarre scene in a frankly head spinning film that comes across as a jubilant two-finger salute by its director Lee Daniels.
Measured alongside his previous film, 2009’s Precious (which earned him a Best Director Oscar nomination), it’s fair to say Daniels has something of the bull in a china shop approach about him and a keen eye for a headline-grabbing project.
Based on Pete Dexter’s novel, The Paperboy exudes a clammy, twisted luridness that would have had Tennessee Williams choking on his iced tea and a roll call of characters that make the buck-toothed Hillbillies of Deliverance look like boy scouts.
Ostensibly, it deals with investigative reporter Ward Jansen (Matthew McConaughey) returning to his Florida hometown with partner Yardley Acheman (David Oyelowo) in tow to try to prove death row convict Hilary Van Wetter innocent (John Cusack) of the local sheriff’s murder. Ward has been coaxed into it by vampish “over sexed Barbie doll” Charlotte Bliss (Kidman), a green mile groupie who’s formed a bond with Van Wetter, and teams up with his younger brother Jack (Efron) to drudge through the murky swamp waters of the case.
However, what starts out as a straightforward enough crime drama very swiftly gets churned up in the film’s wild vortex as its uncomfortable events play out.
While much of the attention and hoo-ha has been directed at the urination scene, there’s plenty else to get more innocent viewers squirming in their seats, including a ludicrously trashy moment when Bliss mimes a sex act for Van Wetter during visiting hours in front of a dumbfounded Ward, Jack and Acheman. It’s so ridiculous – and so sleazily filmed by Daniels – that you end up chuckling at the sheer brazenness of what you’re watching.
The film is narrated by the Jansens’ housemaid Anita (singer Macy Gray), who can barely disguise the contempt she has for her racist employers. She clearly feels protective toward Jack, however, and Daniels emphasises this when a sex scene involving him is cut short when she suggests “I think you’ve seen enough”.
A few exceptions aside (there’s something off about Gray’s performance in particular), a starry cast work their socks off. In her most outlandish role to date, Kidman somehow keeps a straight face throughout, a feat unto itself bearing in mind what’s expected of her.

Yardley Acheman (David Oyelowo), Charlotte Bless (Nicole Kidman) and Jack Jansen (Zac Efron) in The Paperboy
Cusack has a great time chewing the scenery and playing against type as the reddest of rednecks, while Efron is a million miles from his High School Musical days (and all the better for it) and McConaughey continues the ‘McConassance’ (not my pun mores the pity) he’s been enjoying of late in such fare as The Lincoln Lawyer, Magic Mike and Killer Joe.
Set in the 1960s, the film uses a grainy lens and many of the visual tricks adopted at the time to give the film a suitably authentic look. At its best, The Paperboy brings to mind the twisted lunacy of Scorsese’s remake of Cape Fear and the woozy, hallucinatory nature of Night Of The Hunter, but in choosing to turn the dial up to 11 Daniels ends up losing the plot as the narrative gets sucked into the swamp and the whole endeavour takes leave of its senses.
There are many things to admire about The Paperboy, not least of which its sheer weirdness, but what in the hands of a David Lynch or Luis Buñuel could have been a real strength ends up here being the film’s most damaging weakness as you’re left scratching your head wondering whether it was all worth the bother.
Great review here man. The responses to this are mainly mediocre but I’m strangely drawn to it.
Thanks my friend. The best way I can describe it is as a car crash; you just can’t remove your eyes even though you feel bad.
Haha! That sounds good enough for me 😉
Nice review. I planned to see this when it came out of theaters but when I heard the reviews skipped the film.
I think it’s worth it if only just to see if you can do what I couldn’t, ie make head nor tail of it!
Nicely done buddy. Very intrigued by this one 🙂
Thanks as always. Would be interested to read your thoughts.
Nice review! I felt incredibly torn over this film. Part of me thought it was trashy nonsense but I was also intrigued by it and couldn’t help but want to watch more to see what ridiculous scene would turn up next. I thought it was bizarrely put together though. It was essentially Maconaughey’s story yet it was made out like Efron was the major lead and then narrated by Macy Gray (who was somehow narrating scenes she wasn’t in). Could have been so much more but pretty captivating viewing nonetheless.
Cheers! Yeah, I got a bit lost with the Macy Gray narration; it seemed like Daniels had a lot of ideas but couldn’t string them together into a coherent film.
Good review man. It’s not a great movie and actually feels very, very disjointed in parts, but the over-zealous cast and unpredictable story makes it worth a watch. Even if it wasn’t as special as I would have liked to begin with.
Would agree with all that. Kidman’s performance is so unhinged it’s almost worth it just for that.