Review – T2 Trainspotting

So, how do you follow an era-defining testament of 90s youth?

Well, you can’t, and Danny Boyle is smart enough to know that, much like his leading men, trying to match your previous escapades is likely to end in disaster.

T2: Trainspotting PosterWhat we get instead from this sequel to 1996’s kinetic Trainspotting is a contemplative look through the rear view mirror of lives beset by regret, anger, inertia and a deep frustration at what could have been.

While the world has changed irrevocably, Rent Boy/Mark (Ewan McGregor), Sick Boy/Simon (Jonny Lee Miller), Spud/Daniel (Ewen Bremner) and Begbie/Franco (Robert Carlyle) have largely stagnated since that fateful drug deal in London more than two decades ago in which, to quote Spud, “first there was an opportunity… then there was a betrayal”.

That opportunity and betrayal proves the focal point for T2‘s narrative, based loosely on Irvine Welsh’s literary follow-up Porno, which picks up with Mark returning from Amsterdam to an Edinburgh that is both barely recognisable and utterly familiar.

T2: TrainspottingIn one of the film’s numerous sly nods to Trainspotting, it picks up just as the original did with Mark running, except this time it’s not from security guards, but rather on a treadmill. Boyle flashes between this and the end of the first film with Mark’s defiant walk across Waterloo bridge, not only to act as a literal bridge between the two films but also to underscore the passing of time.

Mark fled to Amsterdam in part to get away from his “so-called friends” and fully realises there’s a price to be paid by returning home. While Spud is still a heroin addict and all the more tragic for it, Sick Boy has been reduced to blackmailing businessmen in order to make ends meet, while Begbie remains in prison. Both Sick Boy and Begbie continue to be consumed with vengeance, believing Mark not only stole their share of the drug deal but also their hopes and dreams for a life less ordinary.

T2: TrainspottingIt’s to John Hodge’s credit as writer and Miller’s performance that we are kept guessing as to Sick Boy’s true intentions towards his old friend. Whilst there is undoubted anger and jealousy, the brotherhood and joy the character also exhibits following Mark’s return feels just as genuine.

McGregor slips back into his most iconic role and injects a fearful guilt into his portrayal. In a beautifully touching moment, Mark sits next to his father at the dinner table, with the light casting a human shadow onto the empty chair his late mother would have sat on – another pointed reminder of the cruel march of time.

Carlyle is properly unhinged as Begbie, a powder keg of self-loathing and hatred who  can’t escape the narrow path his upbringing at the hands of a wastrel father set him on.

T2: TrainspottingA terrific cast, which sees the return of several familiar faces from the original, is topped by a moving turn by Bremner as Spud. Blessed with a face that exudes so much with a single look, Bremner injects a growing defiance into the most fragile of the central leads. Mark’s return acts as a reawakening for Spud, who’s told by his friend to channel his addictive energy away drugs into something more creative and fulfilling – the results of which become the film’s beating heart and key source of nostalgia.

Rather than be used as a direct homage to Scorsese as was the case in the original, the heavy use of freeze frame has been attributed by Boyle to his characters capturing a moment in time, much like a Polaroid. It’s a nice touch, although used too liberally by the director so that it ends up becoming something of an affectation.

T2: TrainspottingThat said, the film (and Edinburgh especially) looks stunning and while the needle-drop soundtrack (a big part of the original film’s cultural impact) may not be quite as memorable this time around, it’s in keeping with the tone (Underworld’s Slow Slippy in particular).

In Trainspotting, Mark asks: “So we all get old and then we can’t hack it anymore. Is that it?” The march of time notwithstanding, T2: Trainspotting can hack it with the best of them.

Review – Moonlight

Anyone doubting the power of cinema to break free from the shackles of its self-imposed stereotypes should bask in Barry Jenkins’ Moonlight and think again.

moonlight-posterFilms about the grim reality of existing within some of America’s most damaged neighbourhoods are hardly uncommon and more often than not check off a list that includes drugs and violence.

While Moonlight isn’t devoid of these, they are merely window dressing for what is a deeply personal work about the confusion, pain and pleasure that childhood and adolescence bestows and the importance of accepting who you are.

moonlightIt chronicles three key stages in the painful path to adulthood for the introverted Chiron, a poor kid living in a run-down district of Miami who must contend with a drug-addled mother (played by Naomi Harris), bullying at school and the feelings he develops for best friend Kevin.

Alongside this is the complicated relationship he forms with Blue/Juan (Mahershala Ali), a drug dealer who becomes something of a father figure to young Chiron, but whose choice of career ends up having an adverse affect on his and his mother’s lives.

These early scenes between Ali and Alex Hibert as “Little” Chiron set the tone for what is to come. We are at first wary of Blue’s interest in the child, but his intentions to bring Chiron out of his shell and to show him the fatherly affection Chiron has presumably been missing for much of his life win through.

MoonlightA beautifully played scene in which Blue teaches Chiron to swim is poetic in its grace and suggests a baptism of some sort is taking place for both characters. It is here where the reason for Blue’s fascination with Chiron becomes clear – for it is in this moment when he can be the man you suspect he wants so desperately to be.

As Blue says to Chiron in an exchange that strikes right at the heart of the film : “At some point you got to decide who you want to be; don’t let nobody make that decision for you.”

These words echo throughout Moonlight, not least of which during a devastating dinner table conversation in which a confused and heartbreakingly innocent Chiron, believing he is somehow ‘different’ from the rest, asks Blue “what’s a faggot?” before cutting to the core of Blue by putting two and two together to suggest that, as a drug dealer, he might be complicit in his mother’s addiction.

MoonlightWhile the physical similarity of the three actors who play Chiron as a boy (Hibbert), a scrawny teenager (Ashton Sanders) and a bulked up adult (Trevante Rhodes) is not immediately apparent, the character’s awkwardness in his own skin, expressed through hunched shoulders and a downcast, forlorn expression is a baton seamlessly passed on from one to the next.

The repressed anger that shuts Chiron down as a boy bubbles away in Sanders’ eyes, while the feelings he has for Kevin gain in strength. The tragic consequence of the bullying he experiences pushes Chiron away from Kevin, his mother and Miami.

Years later, the weedy teen has developed into a muscle-bound man (wonderfully played by Rhodes in a star-making turn), made in the image of his surrogate father – even down to the vehicle he drives and the crown dashboard decoration. However, he has yet to heed Blue’s earlier advice and presents a version of himself that’s at odds with his true self (he even wears a set of gold teeth, called ‘fronts’).

MoonlightJenkins has spoken of how much Tarrell Alvin McCraney’s source novel In Moonlight Black Boys Look Blue spoke to him (they grew up in the same Miami neighbourhood, although were never acquainted) and this manifests itself in his screenplay which imbues each character with a depth and history that actors of the calibre of Ali and Harris plunder to rousing effect.

The strength of the performances and the richness of the characters is matched only by James Laxton’s masterful cinematography, which glides the camera in and out in a style that’s reminiscent of Terrence Mallick. A playground football game involving Chiron and a number of other children is turned into a balletic symphony, while a key encounter between Chiron and Kevin on the beach is magnetic to watch.

MoonlightLaxton’s camerawork is lent greater poetry by Nicholas Brittell’s glorious score, which is centred on a recurring six-note refrain and applies the ‘chopped and screwed’ technique to hip hop and orchestral music to create a slowed down and wholly original sound that submerges the viewer and exacerbates the holding pattern Chiron finds himself in.

Moonlight‘s message of tolerance, acceptance and compassion in the face of hate, repression and cruelty is both urgent and powerful. We need films like this, now more than ever.

Review – Split

For a director so renowned for twists and paradigm shifts, M. Night Shyamalan has seemingly saved the best one for his own career.

Split PosterBack in 2013, I wrote a piece on directors I felt should call it a day and Shyamalan was near the top of the list. It was hardly difficult to argue at the time – Lady In The Water (2006), The Happening (2008) and The Last Airbender (2010) were all travesties, while the truly awful After Earth (2013) proved a new low.

This nadir proved something of a turning point as Shyamalan stripped everything back and returned to his low-budget roots by teaming up with micro-budget exploitation producer extraordinaire Jason Blum for 2015’s found footage flick The Visit.

SplitThe renewed promise of that movie is largely realised in this, their latest colaboration, which gifts James McAvoy the role of his career as Kevin, a man who exhibits 23 different personalities due to his being diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder (DID).

While the actual Kevin is largely an invisible bystander, three dominant personalities come to the fore – the threatening, uptight Dennis, the prim, manipulative Patricia and nine-year-old Hedwig.

SplitThis self-entitled ‘horde’ are compelled to abduct teens Casey (Anna Taylor-Joy), Claire (Haley Lu Richardson) and Marcia (Jessica Sula) for a purpose that becomes disturbingly clear as ‘Kevin”s visits to specialist psychologist Dr Fletcher (Betty Buckley) reveal a 24th personality known only as ‘the Beast’ is waiting in the wings to show himself.

Shyamalan has spoken in interviews of the opportunities a low-budget (approximately $10m) provides when it comes to taking risks. While the concept of split personalities is hardly original cinema (Hitchcock’s Psycho remains the high watermark), the film’s frightening opening scene of a kidnapping in broad daylight serves as a shot across the bows that all bets are off.

SplitTight close-ups are used throughout, focusing on McAvoy’s saucer-like eyes and trapping us in Kevin’s fractured psyche along with his trio of victims.

Aside from a completely unnecessary narrative device that leads to each of the girls being in a state of undress, Shyamalan places a brain in each of their heads and has them taking action to find a way out of their perilous dilemma.

As the outsider of the group, misfit Casey is naturally the smartest and tries to play one personality off against the other. A pretty pointless back story, told in flashback, endeavours to give Casey the agency she needs to survive, but Taylor-Joy (fresh from an equally affecting performance in The Witch) does more than enough with the material given to her to make these scenes nothing more than a distraction – towards the end especially.

SplitWhile Taylor-Joy’s blood raw performance is excellent, it’s overshadowed by McAvoy giving it his all and then some in a dizzying turn. It’s the role of a lifetime for anyone brave enough to seize it with both hands and McAvoy unpacks what he brought to the table as a corrupt, mentally evaporating cop in 2013’s Filth and lets rip with a mesmeric barrage of verbal dexterity, contorted body language and unnerving unpredictability that somehow avoids falling into the pit of comical caricature.

The on-screen insanity masks some clunky dialogue, while it’s at least 20 minutes too long and, as a result, drags in places (there’s at least one too many visits to Dr Fletcher’s practice). Meanwhile, the very ending of the film will either make you smile at the director’s chutzpah or leave you wondering whether Shyamalan can ever truly leave the paradigm shifts on the shelf.

Nevertheless, Split is a B-movie treat for most of its running time – words you never thought you’d hear yourself say when describing another Shyamalan film.

Review – Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

The words ‘Star Wars prequel’ need never again be spoken with weariness and despair thanks to Gareth Edwards’ rip-roaring Episode 3.9 of the space opera.

When Disney announced it would be making a series of standalone Star Wars flicks alongside a new trilogy, it was met with a mixed reaction – this was the same company after all that didn’t seem to mind sullying some of its most beloved animated classics with money-grabbing straight-to-DVD sequels.

We’d also been there before 30 years ago when George Lucas went to work destroying his reputation by getting trash like Caravan Of Courage: An Ewok Adventure (1984) made.

The revelation that Edwards would be on board to direct the first of these spin-offs allayed some fears; the (admittedly limited) pedigree of 2010’s excellent Monsters and 2014’s Godzilla reboot, fused with his guerilla style of hands-on filmmaking promised much.

And while Rogue One is an entirely unnecessary entry in the Star Wars canon and almost derails itself in its incessant nods, winks, cameos and fan servicing, it’s also a rollicking good adventure.

Inspired by the line “Rebel spies managed to steal secret plans to the Empire’s ultimate weapon, the Death Star” from the original Star Wars‘ opening crawl, Rogue One follows a ragtag band of insurgents on a suicide mission to infiltrate a heavily guarded Imperial facility and prove that the Empire has designed a super weapon that is more powerful than anyone can possibly imagine.

In reviewing 2015’s The Force Awakens, I praised the film for going back to basics and delivering “a simple story about disparate characters coming together to stop a seemingly insurmountable enemy”.

It’s a quote that applies just as strongly to Rogue One. At its heart the film is essentially a little bit of Mission: Impossible and a lot of Black Hawk Down, Saving Private Ryan and numerous other war movies. Indeed, as Edwards himself has pointed out: “It’s called Star… Wars.”

With such a focus on conflict, it’s not surprising the tone of the film is far more subdued than The Force Awakens. The tone is matched by the griminess of the surroundings that make up Edwards’ ‘lived in universe’ (and what surroundings – the production design is astonishing). Imprisoned at the start of the film on an Imperial-occupied planet, it’s notable that one of the Stormtroopers guarding Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones) on a prison transport looks even more downtrodden and weary than she does. Grunts on both levels are expendable, the film suggests.

Jyn is that Star Wars staple, a strong female character with family issues, in this case her father Galen (Mads Mikkelsen), a research scientist whom she is estranged from as a child in the affecting prologue after he is forcibly recruited by coldly ambitious Imperial Director Krennic (a deliciously oily Ben Mendelsohn) to design what will become the Death Star. The film picks up years later, when she is freed from captivity by the Rebellion and, along with Cassian Andor (Diego Luna) and his dryly sarcastic droid K-2SO (Alan Tudyk), is tasked with searching for her father in the hope of stopping the weapon from being built.

However, when Jyn finds out the Death Star is already active she, along with Cassian and a group of gung-ho anti-Imperialists must do what they can to restore hope to a infighting Rebellion that is on its knees.

One of the most impressive things about Rogue One is its ‘boots on the ground’ approach. Mixed with Edwards’ handheld filming style, the film has a look and feel distinct from the rest of the franchise, whether it be the powder keg of anti-Imperialist resentment that Jyn and Cassian navigate through in the occupied city of Jedha or the film’s spectacular final act which is essentially one long battle to buy Jyn and Cassian enough time to secure the plans.

The desperation of the Rebellion raid on the Imperial facility on the jungle planet of Scarif is evoked with a real sense of stomach-churning intensity and chaos. While Edwards can’t resist showing us several improbable hero moments involving our core cast (especially Donnie Yen’s blind warrior Chirrut Îmwe and Jiang Wen’s gun-blazing Baze Malbus, both of whom deserve more screen time), the life and death stakes for all involved are palpable.

The

Rogue One is at its best when operating under its own set of rules; however, it gets bogged down too often by the myriad references to previous films, whether it be visual touches (we get to see what could be the same Rebel observation officer from Star Wars charting the path of a ship, not once, but twice), audio touches (we get to hear the famous Death Star toaster droid) or cameos from characters familiar from the other films.

Much has been made of one particular blast from the past (no, not Darth Vader – it’s good to see him tearing it up again); a CGI creation (due to the actor who originally played him now being dead) that almost, but doesn’t quite escape the uncanny valley and, as such, ends up pulling you out of the film.

These are fairly minor quibbles though. Rogue One may just be the most expensive fan film ever made, one that ultimately wasn’t needed, but when it’s brought to the screen with as much gusto as this it’s hard to argue against.

Review – Manchester By The Sea

To paraphrase the title of his debut picture, you can count on Keneth Lonergan to deliver the kind of quietly devastating domestic drama that all-too-rarely graces our screens.

It’s a sad fact that Manchester By The Sea represents only the third feature from Lonergan in the past 16 years. While You Can Count On Me (2000) was a critical success and turned a profit, his belated follow-up Margaret endured the sort of tortuous journey to release that normally goes with most Terry Gilliam films.

Eventually seeing the light of day in 2011, Lonergan’s originally conceived three-hour version of Margaret was finally released in 2012 and further elevated the writer/director’s status as one of America’s most compelling cinematic voices.

The wait for this third feature has, thankfully, been considerably shorter and it’s once again filmmaking of the highest calibre, telling a wrenching drama about the debilitating effects of guilt, regret and remorse on people’s lives.

Casey Affleck plays Lee Chandler, an insular figure working a simple routine as a janitor whose blunt conversations with other people tend to be either matter-of-fact or, in the case of a needless bar brawl, self-destructive. His withdrawal from the world, mixed with his seeming need to be punished suggest a pain and darkness in Lee’s past that slowly reveals itself when he is forced to return to his childhood home of Manchester-by-the-Sea upon discovering that his brother Joe (Kyle Chandler) has died.

This fresh trauma compounds a tragic event from his recent past that rears itself in Lee’s mind due to having returned home, while he also discovers that he’s been made sole guardian for Joe’s teenage son Patrick (Lucas Hedges).

Manchester By The Sea could so easily have embraced the same tropes that afflict countless ‘aw-shucks’ Hollywood melodramas whereby the central character overcomes adversity to find redemption and a happy-ever-after ending. That, however, isn’t how life works most of the time and Lonergan is to be applauded for resolutely sticking to his guns when it comes to the narrative path trodden by the film.

Lee is a damaged soul still in limbo from the tragic events that ultimately destroyed his marriage to Randi (Michelle Williams) and his return home is emotionally traumatic. Lonergan’s honest and complex screenplay about a mentally scarred figure haunted by the ghosts of his past never rings false and Affleck’s career-best performance is a masterclass in understatement right until the final scene.

There are no big emotional outbursts here, no Oscar-bait speeches, rather the film slowly and deliberately observes Lee and Patrick as they try to work out a way forward following a death in the family. Sporadic flashbacks serve as memories to what came before, in particular a series of heartbreaking scenes that unravel the devastation that befell Lee and are held together by Lonergan’s inspired use of Tomaso Albinoni’s overwhelming Adagio Per Archi e Organo in G Minor.

While Affleck shines, he’s supported by a stellar cast who don’t squander the material they’ve been given. Hedges is entirely believable as an imperfect, but good 16-year-old kid who isn’t yet emotionally mature enough to fully deal with what life has thrown at him. As such, Patrick makes some foolish decisions, but the bond he gradually forms with Lee is central to the narrative and, like the rest of the film, has a truthfulness that never feels forced.

Williams also makes an impact in the limited time she is on screen, in particular during an agonising exchange late on with Affleck which underlines just how much collateral damage has been caused to both their lives.

Lonergan’s Manchester By The Sea is a work of genuine profundity, an all-too-human tale that leaves its mark on the soul long afterwards.