In Retrospect – Blade Runner: The Final Cut (1982)

It’s a shame in some ways that Ridley Scott’s Prometheus ended up being the title of his underwhelming prequel to Alien rather his imagining of Philip K. Dick’s short story Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?

Cinema gives us too few examples of genuine transcendence - Blade Runner is one of them

Cinema gives us too few examples of genuine transcendence – Blade Runner is one of them

As great a title as Blade Runner is, the influence of the mythical Greek figure who defied the natural order to play god is more appropriate to the maverick Brit’s masterpiece.

Like many masterpieces, however, Scott had to wait for the critical fraternity to come around to his way of thinking – audiences at the time were more interested in watching an extra terrestrial try to phone home than a rain-soaked noir set in a future teetering on the brink.

Admittedly, what audiences were presented with in 1982 was far from what Scott had originally intended. Unsure of what it was dealing with, Warner Bros insisted that a Blade Runner for dummies narration (supplied by a less-than-enthusiastic Harrison Ford) be included explaining what is, on paper, a pretty straightforward narrative. Even more galling to Scott was the bolted on happy ending (using outtakes from Kubrick’s The Shining, ironically) which flew against pretty much everything in the previous 116 minutes and led the director to consider disowning the movie.

The rain-soaked dystopia on 2019-era LA in Blade Runner: The Final Cut

The rain-soaked dystopia on 2019-era LA in Blade Runner: The Final Cut

A reappreciation of the film led to a ‘director’s cut’ being released in 1992. Although much closer to Scott’s original vision, it wasn’t truly his edit, having been put together by film preservationist Michael Arick based on the director’s notes.

It would take a further 15 years before Scott finally received complete artistic control and this ‘final cut’ remains the last word in a sorry saga that has dredged up at least five different versions of what is still regarded as one of the greatest sci-fi films ever made.

Whilst the redundant voiceover and happy ending had been exorcised in the director’s cut, the final cut introduces fascinating new footage that, for many (me included), confirms a commonly held theory as to the background of lead character and titular Blade Runner Richard Deckard (Ford) and makes other, more subtle, digital alterations that could teach a thing or three to George Lucas about less sometimes being more.

Robot love: Deckard (Harrison Ford) and Rachael (Sean Young) in Blade Runner: The Final Cut

Robot love: Deckard (Harrison Ford) and Rachael (Sean Young) in Blade Runner: The Final Cut

According to Scott, Blade Runner “is a film set 40 years hence, made in the style of 40 years ago”. The Los Angeles of 2019 as depicted is unlikely to come to pass in the next three years (President Trump may have other ideas), but the director’s vision of a future he feels many of us may bear witness to in our lifetimes is arguably the most immersive and detailed vision any sci-fi has ever put on screen.

The attention to detail remains astonishing, whether it be the swarms of people going about their business holding umbrellas with the shafts lit up, the multi-cultural fusion of Asian, industrial Britain and American design, or the giant electronic billboards that either seem to advertise soft drinks (some things never change) or feature geishas pushing cigarettes.

Scott’s background in visual design has never been put to better use and he’s helped by a team working at the top of their game, including special effects supervisor David Dryer who was heavily influenced by Fritz Lang’s Metropolis in realising the look of the city, in particular the pyramid-shaped Tyrell Corporation building that dominates the LA skyline.

The extraordinary soundtrack by Vangelis is another touchstone; at once, like the film itself, looking backwards and forwards – a woozy ambient composition that also features an unforgettable contribution from saxophonist Dick Morrissey. Indeed, the soundtrack makes even greater sense thanks to the more fully realised love affair between Deckard and Rachael (Sean Young) that is one of the final cut’s more prominent introductions.

He's seen things, you know. Things you wouldn't even imagine.

He’s seen things, you know. Things you wouldn’t even imagine.

Deckard remains one of Ford’s richest performances, an often unlikable loner who isn’t afraid to get his hands dirty but unwittingly lets his guard down when confronted with someone who is as fascinated with him as he is with her. Young, in an early starring role, is far more than the femme fatales who so often populate noirs, imbuing Rachael with a vulnerability and stillness that both bely and reinforce her artificial origins.

Likewise, Darryl Hannah as the “basic pleasure model” Pris, Joanna Cassidy as the snake-loving Zhora (“beauty and the beast – she’s both”) and Brion James as the bug-eyed Leon play their parts in such a way as to be one small step removed from human – something only the elaborate Voight-Kampff polygraph-style machine can pick up.

However, Blade Runner belongs to Rutger Hauer, who delivers a mesmeric performance as Roy Batty, the magnetic leader of the escaped Nexus 6 Replicant gang who arrive from off world on Earth looking for answers from their maker – Dr Tyrell (Joe Turkel sporting some of the best glasses in movie history). Both Philip K. Dick and Scott were reportedly sold on Hauer from the start, struck by his Aryan looks and piercing eyes, and the actor delivered on that faith, giving us one of cinema’s most memorable screen presences and one of its most oft-quoted speeches (famously written by the actor).

The eyes have it in Blade Runner: The Final Cut

The eyes have it in Blade Runner: The Final Cut

Roy’s howl of rage against the ticking of a clock he has no control over, in spite of his best efforts, is an utterly human response, while the grace and mercy he displays in saving Deckard’s life come the final reel elevate the character into messianic territory – nail driven through hand and all.

The Tyrell Corporation’s motto of ‘more human than human’ could be used to describe not only Roy, but also Rachael and – dramatic pause – Deckard (their only physical giveaway of artificiality is an otherworldly eye reflection – indeed, eyes are a key symbol throughout).

The film’s influence is still being felt today, from the films of Christopher Nolan to The Matrix, anime and about a million other sci-fi movies. One need only watch HBO’s Westworld to see Blade Runner‘s visual imprint.

Cinema gives us too few examples of genuine transcendence – Blade Runner is one of them.

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. The Vern · November 10, 2016

    One of my all time favorite movies. Great review, and I love the section where you talk about Scott’s vision of the future. I think in 2029. Most cities will look a lot like it does.

    • Three Rows Back · November 10, 2016

      Cheers buddy. Yeah, I’m kinda there with you in terms of where we’ll be 10-15 years from now – depressing ain’t it?

  2. Cindy Bruchman · November 10, 2016

    I love Bladerunner and the long history to its final cut is quite the story. Nicely written!. I’ll be glad to check it out and doubt I will miss Ford’s voiceover, although, it was appropriate as it followed the tenets of the film noir.

    • Three Rows Back · November 10, 2016

      Ah, thank you Cindy. Have you not seen a version of Blade Runner without the narration? You really should; the film really doesn’t need it.

  3. Ted Saydalavong (@TSayda) · November 11, 2016

    This is one of my top 5 favorite films and I’ve watched the bluray disc countless times. The first time I saw this film was when I was about 12 or 13 years old, it aired on TV and I watched it on my then awesome 13 inch color TV. I didn’t understand what’s really about but I loved the visual aspect of it. As I’ve gotten older, I grew to appreciate the film even more.

    I remember the final director’s cut version was supposed to come out way back in 2000 but one of the producers refused to let that happen. Apparently he hated the film so much and refuse to sign off on doing the recut of the film. In a way it worked out well because by the time the final cut came out, we got to see it in 1080p bluray instead of 480p DVD!

    Nice overview of a great film!

    • Three Rows Back · November 11, 2016

      That’s great background knowledge Ted; didn’t know that. Good things come to those who wait, eh?

Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s